Using warez version, crack, warez passwords, patches, serial numbers, registration codes, key generator, pirate key, keymaker or keygen for ICE is very effective, but it won't work on black and white films (with the exception of those, like XP2, that are developed in C41 chemicals).Top 4 Download periodically updates software information of photoshop plugin full versions from the publishers,īut some information may be slightly out-of-date. If the images are on colour negatives or positives and you have access to the films and a scanner with Digital ICE an option could to scan the films themselves. After the resize the use of the spot healing brush should take less time. This will shrink the dust etc and quite effectively (depending on how much smaller the image gets) "remove" dust spots. One little piece of trickery is to scan at higher resolution (up to the max optical resolution of the scanner, not to any of those silly interpolated resolutions that just bloat the files) and then resize the image to the output size. It also depends on how picky you need/wish to be and, importantly, how large the final files need to be. In addition such filters will affect the general sharpness of the scan too, though that can be dealt with afterwards by clever use of sharpening. Global adjustments like the dust and scratches filter, or the FlexTouch filter in Hasselblad's FlexColor, are not reliable and actually create more work than they remove since it will virtually always be necessary to look over the image at 100% to check what remains after the filter. And it can be very time-consuming depending on the image. In my experience Photoshop's spot healing brush is the way to go almost all the time. The dust and scratches filter is kind of a nuclear option, so it is best to use it as sparingly as you can. When using this filter, it can be enough to do it at a low level to take care of the small dust, and then go back through and take the more substantial pieces out with the spot healing brush. I have had to resort to this on occasion when printing for museums if they are doing archival images from their collection, which tend to be dusty or damaged. This works best on older, softer originals like darkroom prints from older cameras.the prints are not that sharp to begin with, so the blurring of the filter does not affect it. Generally this filter works best for prints over film, as the dust on prints tends to be very sharp (when scanned), and the prints themselves are inherently softer, as they are enlargements. It is a bit risky and takes finesse to adjust the level of blurring (radius and threshold etc) such that it does not affect the main image detail while still removing the dust. If your photos are covered with lots and lots of dust, there are some options like the Dust and Scratches filter. The only downside to this method is pending on how dirty the prints are, and how long you have to spend, it can be impractical. That will give the most seamless result without touching the overall photo. For general dust spotting of a few spots, it is best to use the spot healing brush. The reason for this is that it is a pixel level editor, unlike Lightroom. If you do, it is a much much better solution than Lightroom. If you have access to lightroom, you probably have access to photoshop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |